Talk:Dag Heward-Mills

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

Ghana

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ghana, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ghana on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GhanaWikipedia:WikiProject GhanaTemplate:WikiProject GhanaGhana
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dag Heward-Mills. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150924204940/http://www.christianpress.com/us/culture-a-society/494-african-evangelist-sending-missionaries-to-the-us-dag-heward-mills.html to http://www.christianpress.com/us/culture-a-society/494-african-evangelist-sending-missionaries-to-the-us-dag-heward-mills.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:09, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV

Dear Wikipedians,

I added the NPOV template to the already-present issue template, because much of the information on this page is either from websites directly associated with the subject, or the information is poorly sourced. In certain cases the links do not function, in others the links don't lead to the actual information the source should refer to but to the overarching website. Some of the grander statements offer no proof, for instance: "Heward-Mills is also one of the best-selling authors in the Christian world today" which has no reference at all. If anyone has any way of finding third-party information on this subject or more accurate links or citations, that would be much appreciated.

77.57.175.165 (talk) 14:54, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Controversy section

The current Controversy section is very poorly-sourced (including Facebook, Reddit, YouTube). I think it should probably be cut down to only what is reliably sourced - it looks as if The Fourth Estate is a reliable source. Do others have views? Tacyarg (talk) 12:26, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are right but some of the allegations may be substantiated, see [1] Yen.com.gh [2] thefourthestategh.com. The article needs neutral description of relevant significant facts. Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 06:49, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]