Talk:DOSEMU

Article poorly written

Why exactly does the article talk about some DOS programs running poorly on Windows VDM without actually comparing how these programs run on DosEmu in Linux? All it does is mention how some programs run fine on Dosemu (which may also run fine on Windows VDM for all we know). It doesn't make sense. Comparing the Windows VDM to the Linux Dosemue is fine, but a vague statement on problems with the Windows VDM without then going in to how Dosemu compares is silly and reads a bit like an advertisment Nil Einne 17:29, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Linux only??

The article says, "Currently it is only available for x86 Linux systems." However, I thought I'd heard that it also optionally ran on NetBSD. Does it no longer do so? Armslurp (talk) 06:12, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Emulators that run on Mac OS X

Are there any DOS emulators that run on Mac OS X? 216.99.201.138 (talk) 05:45, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Small changes

The current article doesn't mention Windows. Surely the salient point is that dosemu is a Linux solution to running DOS programs. Comparison with Windows is pointless.

Linux only? Hopefully this is now explained.

MAC OS X. There's Bochs; its ubiquitious. There's also a MAC version of dosbox. QEMU and other virtual machines will have some capability for running DOS programs; I don't know how well, but probably poorly, since to be honest, DOS emulation sucks on stock Intel-Windows systems.

mikeshupp030@gmail.com99.155.192.218 (talk) 23:56, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on DOSEMU. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://dosemu.org/stable/announce

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:38, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]