Talk:DOGMA

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the DOGMA article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Belgium

	Belgium portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belgium, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belgium on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelgiumWikipedia:WikiProject BelgiumTemplate:WikiProject BelgiumBelgium-related articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Higher education

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education articles

Untitled

Dogma?

It's real work, although the article is turgid

I can't tell if this work is any good, but there are references to it. The article is far more turgid than the papers written by DOGMA's proponents. The Wikipedia article definitely needs a rewrite. Some references for background:

It's a "semantic web" thing, yet another one of those ontology systems intended to impose some formal structure onto natural language. Historically, that doesn't work very well (see "Artificial Intelligence meets Natural Stupidity", by Drew McDermott), but people keep trying. --John Nagle 18:20, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"we"?

"Therefore, in De Leenheer (2007)[8] he identified a set of primitive operators for changing ontologies. We make sure these change primitives are conditional, which means that their applicability depends on pre- and post-conditions[9]." - "We"? —Preceding unsigned comment added by JensMueller (talk • contribs) 19:22, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]