Talk:DNA sequencing
This level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
DNA sequencing received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 360 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
THE REPLICATION AND DETERMINATION OF DNA IN ITS RAW FORM.
[edit]If this is possible that a DNA strand can be copied by tRNA mRNA and create a polypeptide sequence, and we know we can replicate it. over the years I have studied this subject and heard the some where someone is mapping the dna sequence of a human being as the dna is all similar obviously not the same or we would all be carbon copies of each other like the bits that make us tall short different eye colour ect. then why do we insist on hacking people open and mending holes in hearts etc if a sample of tissue can be replicated and grown on a mouse back for example how long will it be that it is a simple thing called copy and paste we use it all the time in computers copy the affected area and past a new bit back in this can be put in the form of an injection or hyper spray and as scar tissue is formed over an area of a wound it’s the body’s way of compensating for the loss of information to that area why can’t we do the same.
Media
[edit]Adding images to the different ways of sequencing DNA could really help with understanding how they work. EliasMari (talk) 03:00, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Wiki Education assignment: Zoology
[edit]This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 30 January 2023 and 30 April 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Nanalpr (article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by Nanalpr (talk) 02:22, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
complaint
[edit]this section https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DNA_sequencing#Microscopy-based_techniques
is sort of clickbaitish: this is a dead method that has never actually worked very well if at all yet posters keep pumping it (not, IMO, hyperbole) editors, can't we do something about this ??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cinnamon colbert (talk • contribs) 17:38, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
complaint
[edit]this section https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DNA_sequencing#Sample_preparation
is really wierd; it just lists robots but comnpanies like Sage Science, Circulomics,etc et are not mentioned — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cinnamon colbert (talk • contribs) 17:54, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
- C-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in Biology and health sciences
- C-Class vital articles in Biology and health sciences
- C-Class Molecular Biology articles
- Low-importance Molecular Biology articles
- C-Class Genetics articles
- Top-importance Genetics articles
- WikiProject Genetics articles
- C-Class MCB articles
- High-importance MCB articles
- WikiProject Molecular and Cellular Biology articles
- C-Class Computational Biology articles
- High-importance Computational Biology articles
- WikiProject Computational Biology articles
- All WikiProject Molecular Biology pages
- C-Class neuroscience articles
- Low-importance neuroscience articles
- Old requests for peer review