Talk:DIN 1451

Text and/or other creative content from this version of DIN (typeface) was copied or moved into DIN 1451 with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Merger proposal

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was to pages merged D O N D E groovily Talk to me 17:06, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The articles DIN (typeface) and DIN 1451 are clearly about the same subject and should be merged. The title DIN (typeface) is pretty useless (other than as a disambiguation page), as there are a number of different DIN standards that define typefaces, but these have nothing in common historically or stylistically , other than having been published by DIN. Articles that talk about particular national or international standards should always carry the number of the relevant standard in the canonical title, in this case DIN 1451, as there are tens of thousands of other DIN standards. Markus Kuhn (talk) 19:56, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, please merge it Gürkan Sengün (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 21:02, 2 September 2009 (UTC).[reply]

I agree, merge. --96.4.76.1 (talk) 20:32, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree wholeheartedly with the comments of the proposer and support the merger of DIN (typeface) into DIN 1451. I wonder why it's taking so long! -- Picapica (talk) 11:20, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

"Nollendorfplatz" font in the image

I'm no expert on the variants of this DIN typeface, but in my eyes the text "Nollendorfplatz" in the example image might be another typeface. At least it's not the same as the other narrow example characters in the image, and it's not as geometric as the DIN typeface as I know it. Someone with more knowledge could perhaps confirm or explain. :-) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wmattis (talk • contribs) 14:02, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The word Nollendorfplatz is written in DIN 30640, or Neuzeit Grotesque. I guess someone got confused with the different "DIN"s. 83.34.178.196 (talk) 06:31, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bad kerning in the example image

The spacing before and after the ones is much too big. It looks like DIN 1 45 1. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.139.125.186 (talk) 16:42, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Addition of Characters in Gurmukhi Unicode range to Engschrift and Mittelschrift DIN 1451 fonts

Could someone with more experience of this than me (not that difficult) add the following to the main page with the right bits (and any further bits) in the right places, please?

--

MFF DIN 1451 Gurmukhi

A version of DIN 1451 designed for the Gurmukhi (Punjabi) writing system.

In 2013, MFF DIN 1451, consisting of MFF DIN 1451 Engschrift and MFF DIN 1451 Mittelschrift, was released. It was designed by Paul Alan Grosse and made available free of charge for commercial and non-commercial use.

The Latin characters in the fonts were based upon the early designs for the characters, including the "a", "t", "6" and "9" in the Engschrift font.

The designs for the Gurmukhi characters are in keeping with the style of the Latin characters in each of the fonts and include contextual substitutions for the Adhak character.

Taking into consideration that due to lack of Gurmukhi Unicode support in commercial image editing programs, most Punjabi publishing uses fonts with character mappings of Gurmukhi characters in the ASCII range (Latin characters are substituted with Gurmukhi characters), two additional versions were produced with those mappings, each of them having the suffix "A" in the font's name.

All four of the fonts are Kerned and Hinted.

--

External References:

Paul Alan Grosse - reference to Luc Devroye's site http://luc.devroye.org/fonts-33560.html

MFF DIN 1451 font's free download - http://www.billie.grosse.is-a-geek.com/resources-03h.html

--

Thanking you in advance.

Bagheahrda (talk) 10:40, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on DIN 1451. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

Attempted to fix sourcing for http://typophile.com/node/56644

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:20, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on DIN 1451. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:08, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Grandview (typeface)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Grandview (typeface) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 13 § Grandview (typeface) until a consensus is reached. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 13:20, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]