Talk:DIEP flap

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's Health

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's Health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HealthTemplate:WikiProject Women's Healthwomen's health articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

note

This is not a topic I know a great deal about, but it reads somewhat biassed to me. "Unfortunately", etc. The language could also use a bit of a cleanup. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 163.246.213.37 (talk) 12:08, 28 October 2013 (UTC) The claims made for the DIEP flap procedure are substantial. The fact that these claims have not yet been substantiated, and perhaps will not be substantiated, are critical information for potential candidates. I hope the author keeps this article current. I am baffled that this article is assigned low importance.Harry1948 (talk) 06:02, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality Template Flag Removal

Since the noted bias was removed in 2015, the neutrality flag seems to be a candidate for removal now.

73.18.173.223 (talk) 14:40, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not quite biased but still poorly written

Bias is less in the fact that it presents the facts of the article without citations. This seems like it was written by a surgeon who performs the procedure themselves. While well intentioned there are a lot of unsubstantiated claims. The format isn't quite up to the standards of Wikipedia. Unfortunately, I don't know enough about the subject matter to do the complete rewrite it deserves but dear lord please someone fix it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Frapsity (talk • contribs) 13:37, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]