Jump to content

Talk:DICE framework

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Notability of DICE framework

[edit]

While the DICE framework is a creation of Boston Consulting Group, it is a tool that has become relatively widespread by program management offices and other steering groups as means of determining how likely a project is to succeed in achieving its aims -- so it is not an internal process of a single organisation. It has also been referenced in many books, some of which will be added to the article to assist in the claim of notability. Also please note, that I have no connection to Boston Consulting Group. Greyskinnedboy  Talk  23:10, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on DICE framework. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:58, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]