Talk:DDR4 SDRAM/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Arsenikk ^(talk) 22:17, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Is 'nm' namometer? If so, use the full word. Initialisms should be avoided at first use. I notice it is linked on fourth or so use, the link should be in the first mention. The same with Mb/s and MHz as an initialism and the linking of volt and DDR late in the article. This aspects needs a thorough clean-up for the whole article, such as CAS, CRC etc.
How can one in 2011 know what the market share of DDR3 will be in 2012 (market share five years after 2007 launch)?
The sentence starting with "In February 2009" reads awkward.
The fair use image is probably fine until the article reaches sales, at which time it would have to be replaced by a free image.
'bandwidth' and 'point-to-point' are both disambig pages.
Link three under ref 28 is dead.
As 'Synchronous dynamic random access memory' is linked in the article, it should not be in the see also section.
Quotes should be in quotation marks, not italics (probably not a GA criteria, but I'll mention it anyways).
Did some minor tweaking.

Otherwise the article is well-written, interesting and encyclopedic. Placing on hold until the above has been seen to. Arsenikk ^(talk) 22:17, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am failing the article as no work has been done in three weeks to meet the above comments. Arsenikk ^(talk) 20:07, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]