Talk:DCU Students' Union

Ireland Low‑importance

	Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Higher education: Student Affairs

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education articles
	This article is supported by Student Affairs task force.

Untitled

The section on USI is inaccurate. The reforms never reached Congress to be defeated, as they were submitted too late. The author has omitted this, and the section includes a lot of weasel words, particularly in regard to the Fianna Fail issue. The "reforms" were drawn up by four Universities, DCU, UCD, TCD and Maynooth, all of which had a Fianna Failer as President. The other Colleges who wanted reform supported "Plan B" drawn up by the likes of ben Archibald, not the "Fianna 4" plan outlined in this article. Lets not re-write history here, folks! 140.203.12.242 18:03, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Democracy and all that jazz...

Isn't it the case that DCUSU had a disaffiliation referendum after congress? Their ideas were shot down so they decided to leave, rather than accept a democratic decision of USI Congress?

- No.

Idiot. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 136.206.1.17 (talk) 18:47, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reference and external link

Should there be only one link since they are the same? Chris 18:50, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Webhost

Until recently (June 2017), this article was tagged for significant cleanup. While some issues remain, it is somewhat improved from previous incarnations. And hence not tagged as heavily as it was. In general, editors (in particular involved or potentially COI editors) might consider the relevant guidelines - to avoid a return to a heavily tagged article. In short, Wikipedia is not meant to mirror/supplement the subject's own website. (Excessive lists of SU members for example were removed for issues with WP:NOTWEBHOST and WP:INDISCRIMINATE. Or what amounted to "minutes" of SU debates were removed for problems relative to the guidelines about the project not being a news source or a publisher of press releases ). Involved editors might want to consider the simple lasting importance or 10 year tests before using the project as a type of messageboard (for airing-of-grievances after a vote on how to fund this year's summer ball). That being said, if involved editors want to contribute any cited and historically relevant content (perhaps for inclusion in a history section) that might improve the article further.... Guliolopez (talk) 00:47, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]