Talk:DCE/RPC

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Networking task force.

Cleanup tag

This article is pretty good but it still needs a little work. The article has a point of view and that should be limited. The prose could also be rewritten to be more formal. Then this article would really start to shine. Triddle 19:09, September 10, 2005 (UTC)

Done! Thanx 69.142.2.68 01:56, 11 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

User:lkcl oops, you cut a bit too much, dude :) it doesn't explain what dce/rpc is for, nor does it explain any more why people have avoided it. you also, most crucially, cut the bit about dce/rpc being designed by committee :)

OK I added "design by committee" back in a slightly more encyclopedic tone, although I'd also appreciate a source for it. What it is you'll have to put in, as to why it was avoided, that I tried to distill to something NPOV and readded. Also, generally you sign your name @ the end ;D (The infamous 4 ~s). Thanx 69.142.2.68 21:03, 20 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hiya, thanks for considering putting stuff back in. well i was only partly kidding about the design-by-committee, but it's true. Nobody but a well-organised committee would come up with _this_ lot: http://www.opengroup.org/tech/rfc/ User:lkcl 28sep2005

Luke, is "support for AMD64" really "support for LP64 platforms"? Maybe 99 44/100% of the LP64 platforms using FreeDCE are AMD64/x86-64/x64/EM64T/whatever machines, but if it's just making the code 64-bit clean, it also supports Alpha/PPC64/SPARCv9/IA-64/PA-RISC 2.0/etc.. Guy Harris 07:36, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Survey says: yes. I updated it. Guy Harris 00:03, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the editorializing on what people with "extensive experience" want and the evils of reinventing the wheel, it really isn't necessary or relevant here IMHO. I tried to keep the basic point of the original paragraph, which is that the complexity has reasons for being there.

This article might also want to include that DCE/RPC and SUN/ONC RPC are not compatible. --Maetrics 23:46, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"IDL-interoperable" what does the IDL stand for? I got ambiguous answers when I researched it. SkipR 09:32, 9 May 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ryper (talk • contribs)

"Interface Definition Language", derived from "Network Interface Definition Language (NIDL)" which was part of the Network Computing System from which DCE/RPC was derived. E.g., see https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLTBW_2.1.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r1.halx001/netcomnidlc.htm 74.104.146.178 (talk) 12:31, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ฉันอย่ากได้IDที่ล็อกอินจากเฟสๆฉันมีคนแฮกเข้าสู่ระบบบัญชีเฟสไม่สามาถรเข้าเฟสได้อีกเลย

@ตั้ม สุริยันต์ 2001:44C8:494D:92C8:60FD:2099:E34F:5553 (talk) 13:51, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]