Talk:DCA Design

Warwickshire Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Warwickshire, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Warwickshire. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Please also feel free to join in the discussions on the project's talk page.WarwickshireWikipedia:WikiProject WarwickshireTemplate:WikiProject WarwickshireWikiProject Warwickshire articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Contested deletion

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because DCA are the UKs most successful product design and product development company. They have created hundreds of iconic procuct designs in the Uk including the Stanley knife blade, the Channel Tunnel trains and the BT phone box. For these reasons DCA deserve an entry in Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mirohal (talk • contribs) 10:09, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because --Mirohal (talk) 09:02, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Success is not the issue, and 'deserve' does not fit within Wikipedia policy. Any topic needs to be ~~reverences~~ referenced to multiple independent in-depth coverage. Directory listings, product packages, the company's own site can be used afterward for uncontested details. See Wikipedia:Wikipuffery for phrases and words to avoid. Dru of Id (talk) 09:21, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The 1967 Design Journal article, for instance, is about the awards, the judges, the product, and the designer. Dru of Id (talk) 09:28, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The speedy deletion request was already declined, as the industry awards won which are verifiable denote recognition, although the article still needs major work. I've reoganized the sections in the standard order so that others can follow discussions later. Dru of Id (talk) 09:38, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion objection

We have noted that this page has been marked as "Proposed for Deletion" although we were not notified of this. We have taken on-board the suggestions earlier on this page and are in the process of updating our entry to be more relevant to Wikipedia and provide more external references and sources to go with the descriptive text. We trust this is enough in the short term to allow the PROD marking to be removed and we will aim to complete our changes as soon as possible. Rgledhill (talk) 14:12, 1 August 2016 (UTC)Rgledhill[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on DCA Design International Ltd. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081229053844/http://wck2.companieshouse.gov.uk:80/ to http://wck2.companieshouse.gov.uk/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:30, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]