Jump to content

Talk:D. G. S. Dhinakaran

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Arbitrary heading 1

[edit]

To protect and preserve the truth, neutrality of the page Controversies on the Jesus Calls Ministries should be included. Also, adding biased or otherwise opiniated comments such as "he truly was an apostle" will bring the standards to disrepute; please refrain from doing so.


He still continued to work in the bank till the 1980s and used to preach the gospel in his spare time till he retired. So I have corrected the entry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.6.229.127 (talk) 21:22, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitrary heading 2

[edit]

Regarding: (Reverted good faith edits by Gopal.tn (talk): Please do your evangelising someplace else. (TW)) (undo | thank)

The previous edit by Gopal.tn, which added some new info, might have been skewed, nevertheless it needed not an undo, but only a few edits to be made equable. Total undo could have been deferred. Moreover, the comment, "Please do your evangelising someplace else", was brusque and impolite, and could easily have been something more polite and equanimous.not the world (talk) 14:27, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Evangelical subjects tend to attract evangelical people, who seem often not to have a clue how Wikipedia operates. The addition was of no benefit at all to the article - some meandering comment about an uncle. Equally, this item that I reverted is ludicrous. I can't stop people from believing what ever it is they want to believe but evangelicals can often be fringe-like in their interpretations and opinions, of which the quotation removed in that revert seems a prime example. Just because someone says something does not mean that we include it. Similarly, we really should not be using evangelical sources in this article except for comments about themselves. And I do mean themselves, not Dhinakaran. - Sitush (talk) 15:26, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:51, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:07, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]