Talk:D. E. Shaw Research

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Anxdo (talk · contribs) / D. E. Shaw Research This user has contributed to the article. This user has declared a connection. (On his/her user page, this article's creator declares his/her affiliation with D. E. Shaw Research (DESRES).)

Not G11

I can't see any plausible claim that this article meets CSD G11. The article describes a privately held company, but the tone of the description does not resemble advertising copy. Moreover, this company (and specifically its research papers) have been widely mentioned in scientific literature, and the company is of general notability.

Disclaimer: I consult for DEShaw Research myself, quite apart from being an active Wikipedian. I didn't write this article, but my familiarity with the company informs my judgement of its notability. LotLE×talk 20:43, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]