Talk:Dŵr Cymru Welsh Water

Wales Low‑importance

	Wales portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Water

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Water, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Water supply-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WaterWikipedia:WikiProject WaterTemplate:WikiProject WaterWater articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Business Low‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

history

Why has the article been annotated "The neutrality of this section is disputed. Please see the discussion on the talk page. Please do not remove this message until the dispute is resolved. (December 2007)", when there is nothing whatever on the talk page, and no history either? Deipnosophista (talk) 18:43, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I guess it's because that section reads like it was written by the company or someone close to it. Rd232 ^talk 18:46, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sure does. Complete lack of neutrality - a truly congratulatory pat-on-the-back - and no references whatsoever. Needs a drastic edit or removing (pass the scissors!). Enaidmawr (talk) 19:54, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Scissors were the best solution... Enaidmawr (talk) 22:28, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not for profit

The current text states

This differentiates it from all the other Water companies operating in England and restores it to the same organisational status as water supply utilities in Scotland and the pre-privatisation water supply undertakings in England

and is sourced back to Welsh Water's own documentation. This seems disingenuous . When the company (then called Hyder) failed and it became a not for profit company, almost all of its services were outsourced to contractors, many from United Utilities. That remains the case. This means that a large chunk of every pound paid by a Welsh consumer actually ends up in the pockets of United Utilities a very much for profit company. It seems disingenuous at best and plain wrong at worst to claim that this is the same as the the pre-privatisation water companies. Any thoughts? Velella ^{Velella Talk} 17:18, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Were Welsh water shareholders reimbursed? 2A00:23C7:21A5:901:451:7357:7085:A652 (talk) 12:29, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]