Talk:Dælenenga idrettspark/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Thine Antique Pen (talk · contribs) 12:33, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

I shall review.

Infobox

• "Oslo Municipality" -> "Municipality of Oslo".  Done

Lead

• "Oslo Municipality" -> "Municipality of Oslo".  Done

History

• Seems good, contains good information, references fine.

Facilities

• Yep, good. "Ruter" may need explaining, but not required.

Events

• The information included there is fine. The three tables are correctly formatted and are used correctly.

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Pass. ⇒TAP 12:47, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Thank for taking the time for both this and the other review. Arsenikk ^(talk) 15:01, 1 July 2012 (UTC)