This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Writing systems, a WikiProject interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage and content of articles relating to writing systems on Wikipedia. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project’s talk page.Writing systemsWikipedia:WikiProject Writing systemsTemplate:WikiProject Writing systemsWriting system articles
I've tried to expand the table with Bulgarian, and the result is visible in my sandbox. I take it that we do want to have the Bulgarian and Russian systems compared side by side in the same table, but I'm not sure of the best way to do that – the table I've got at present seems rather unclear. Any thoughts? – Uanfala (talk)17:31, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I figured it would be in a separate table in its own section like the Russian table is in the Russian section, but I suppose it could be in the same table. Your table seems reasonably clear; what do you think is unclear about it that we could work on improving? Putting everything in one table could get unwieldy if many more languages are added, but we could cross that bridge when we come to it. -sche (talk) 20:52, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I guess I was thinking of having them both in the same table so that the parallels and differences between the two systems would be clearer. As for the table that we've got there, I felt like the addition of another column for Bulgarian somewhat reduces the readability when there's a small amount of text in a cell shared between the two columns and it's centred: see for example the entry for "ay". – Uanfala (talk)22:32, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
