Talk:Cylindropuntia imbricata/GA1

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
I'm reassessing the article as part of GA sweeps, to double check older GAs to make sure they still meet the criteria. For the most part this article's still good, though I have the following issues:

Is there really all there is on this plant? It looks like something that would have a decent amount on it.
All citation needed tags need to be addressed.
The gallery is a nice touch; if all could have captions though that'd be a plus.
"(or walking stick cholla, tree cholla, chainlink cactus, etc.)" I'd stick to keeping a few most common names and leaving out the etc.
Second part of range and habitat should probably be cited.

I'll put this on hold for five days so these issues can be fixed. Since it's a small article there's not too much at least. If fixed this will remain a GA, if not it won't. Wizardman 02:23, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There's clearly a lot of progress being made on this article, so it'll remain a GA. Wizardman 19:39, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]