Talk:Cylindrical Energy Module

Page layout:

I was thinking about having 3 sections: Pumps, Engine, and Applications. Though without much information except for the EP Industries website I don't know what else to go by. Any ideas? Or is it better to leave it as is, with all the info bungled up together? -Goney3 21:57, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Content:

What works better? More pictures, facts, or commentary? Am I the only editor of this article? Where did all the mechanical engineers go? -Goney3 21:57, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thoughts on the CEM:

Add your views and opinions here please. -Goney3 21:57, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the description of this pump/engine leaves a lot to be desired. It is self conflicting with a rotating rotor with something undescribed moving back and forth. This article needs a graphic or illustration for it to be meaningful. Being a mechanical engineer the description is found to be inadequate. 216.231.162.9 13:27, 29 April 2007 (UTC) ART PEREZ P.E.[reply]

There are a few animations on the EP Industries website, but I'd have to get permission from them to post it here. In the meantime I'll have to look into possibly making my own. Its really fascinating how it works, but I am terrible when it comes to words. Any input and changes would be very beneficial to everyone. Many thanks! -Goney3 22:04, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There are specs for the engine listed here http://www.epindustries.com/intro_pdx.html . I'm not sure why they we left blank in the article and I'm new to the whole editing content thing so I'll just post the link here. (Abic.ophymx 21:41, 17 July 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Thank you Abic.ophymx ... I'll get this information updated ASAP. Thank you for the heads up!

Yes the CEM page is written like an advertisement. There has been no recent developments on this invention. -User:gndate Goney3 22:32, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]