Talk:Cyclone Graham/GA1

GA Review

Hi! I will be reviewing this article for GA status, and should have the full review up within a couple of hours. Dana boomer (talk) 17:05, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   • All references need publisher information.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Just one issue with the references that needs to be addressed before the article is promoted to GA status, so I am putting the article on hold to allow time to deal with this concern. Drop me a note if you have any questions. Dana boomer (talk) 18:08, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Done. The references in question had the publisher as their author, so I switched it around. –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 18:40, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Everything looks good, so I'm passing the article. Dana boomer (talk) 18:46, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks (my third GA today!) :-) –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 18:50, 12 September 2008 (UTC)