Talk:Cyberpunk (short story)

A fact from Cyberpunk (short story) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 31 May 2017 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the cyberpunk science-fiction genre was named after the 1983 short story "Cyberpunk" by Bruce Bethke?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2017/May. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Cyberpunk (novel).

Wikipedia

Science Fiction Low‑importance

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Contradictory info in Novel section

@Kazvorpal: I recovered material in this section that was not displayed due to a faulty ref tag set. There are problems: the narrative about selling and not publishing the novel now seems self-contradictory or maybe redundant. Was it not published because the publisher "regained his sanity and decided not to release it", or because the ending was not changed as requested? Also, several claims lack anything I could find in your citations so I had to add citations needed tags. Can you address these issues prior to the DYK appearance? RobP (talk) 16:05, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for fixing what I'm guessing was my typo. I think it can safely be seen as self-evident that when he says "recovered his sanity" he was being self-deprecatingly ironic, trying to make it clear he was glossing over some unfortunate story...which he actually went into years later, in the other quote. — Kaz (talk) 17:24, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Kazvorpal: Regarding your edit reversion which I just undid and which has this edit summary: These are covered by the existing citations, if you bother reading the material cited: Well I did look at the reference cited at the end of the end of this paragraph before I made that edit - and again now - and it is merely the e-book referenced there. There is no historical info provided at all in that reference. If there is another reference backing up this material, you must cite it on the sentences, or at least on the paragraph. Having references for this material elsewhere in the article is insufficient. (BTW, I could find it in none of the current references!) Surprised you think otherwise. RobP (talk) 19:38, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cyberpunk (novel). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151125214544/http://www.strangehorizons.com/2005/20050711/bethke-int-a.shtml to http://www.strangehorizons.com/2005/20050711/bethke-int-a.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:28, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]