Talk:Cybermind

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Internet culture To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles
Expand : Pick an article from here or here
Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images
Stubs : All stubs are located here
Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}}
- See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention

Deletion of Manifesto and Joining information

I took the liberty of deleting the information on how to join the group and the manifesto, since such information doesn't really belong in an encyclopedia (in my view, see WP:Not, esp. number 7). Thoughts or comments? --Hansnesse 23:43, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

thoughts :) I can see that joining info is probably vetoed by point 8, carrying on of business. But the manifesto seems to also function as a description of the list, and in some ways acts as a snapshot of internet history, rather than indiscrimiate information. What do you think?

jon

Perhaps, as an primary source document, we could send it over to Wikisource, which is a repository for such things? Inclusion in wikipedia usually means it is up to be copyedited, clarified and updated. I have never tried wikisource before, but it should be possible (provided it is not under copyright or has been licensed for such use). Do you know who holds the copyright for it?

Incidentally, you may want to register on Wikipedia (there is no collection of personal information, and of course it is free). It provides a means of communicating (a personal talk page), as well as gives you a unique signature. You can already sign material by typing four tildes (~~~~), but all that appears will be your non-unique numerical IP address (and the date). To register, click the appropriate link at the top of your screen. I use my name, but most people do not. --Hansnesse 04:18, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup tag

I went ahead and removed the cleanup tag, since (in my view) certainly at Wikipedia's quality. Of course, there is nothing to keep if from being expanded or edited further. --Hansnesse 00:02, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sources?

On the previous AFD, someone mentioned that there were papers about this? I haven't been able to find any of them online, but I don't have access to jstor or anything right now. If we can't find any sources on this, then it should probably be deleted. Wickethewok 19:11, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hope the sources are now detailed enough

j —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.217.52.15 (talk) 03:55, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Cybermind. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:22, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]