Talk:Cyathus olla/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
I'll be reviewing this article shortly. Ealdgyth - Talk 14:56, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
Information in the lead that isn't in the body of the article, suggest one or two more sentences in the lead
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Specific concerns

Everything in the lead should be mentioned in the body of the article also. So you need to put the lead's first two sentences' information into the body of the text. (It should stay in the lead too)

Done. Sasata (talk) 18:08, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Might mention that it can reproduce both asexually and sexually in the lead, that's a good tidbit from the article that can fluff up the lead a bit more (It's a bit skimpy)

Done. Sasata (talk) 18:08, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Otherwise looks good, lead's comprehensible to lay-persons.

I've put the article on hold for seven days to allow folks to address the issues I've brought up. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, or here with any concerns, and let me know one of those places when the issues have been addressed. If I may suggest that you strike out, check mark, or otherwise mark the items I've detailed, that will make it possible for me to see what's been addressed, and you can keep track of what's been done and what still needs to be worked on. Ealdgyth - Talk 15:06, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reviewing another bird's nest article for me, it is much appreciated. There will be more :) Sasata (talk) 18:08, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]