Talk:Cutter Consortium

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Business

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Talk:Cutter Consortium

I just reauthored a Cutter Consortium entry to replace the original entry that was deleted on November 21, 2006. The new page is not a marketing piece (admittedly, the old one was), and is consciously NPOV (though there's always room for improvement, I know.) If you scan the category "List of research companies", many other companies in the space have had their listings deleted for the same reason the Cutter one was. But others are still there. If they still appear and Cutter does not, Wikipedia is less useful and complete than it would be otherwise.

Thanks for your consideration and your work on this -- talk amongst yourselves... Kimleonard 19:58, 26 December 2006 (UTC)Kim Leonard[reply]

It seems unavoidable that those who are associated with an enterprise are unable to see their own work as being promotional and advertorial. You feel this is not a marketing piece. I would disagree. I will admit that there are other articles with similar problems that have not been removed, but one bad article never justifies another. (P.S. A truly encyclopedic article would never contain the buzzword-fest that is the Corporate Goals section.) Fan-1967 20:03, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Appreciate your feedback -- Corporate Goals is gone. I absolutely agree that one bad article doesn't justify another. Working on making this a good one. Kimleonard 20:10, 26 December 2006 (UTC)kim leonard[reply]

There's an erroneous link under the Cutter home page link -- REDIRECT: Environmental Quality Management. It's unrelated to Cutter. But when I try to edit it out, it doesn't show up in the wiki entry. Can someone help me out here? Thanks. User:Kimleonard Kimleonard 18:44, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]