Talk:Cutie Q/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Blue Pumpkin Pie (talk · contribs) 20:14, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I'll start reviewing this article. I'll let you know the results in a couple of days.Blue Pumpkin Pie (talk) 20:14, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

@Namcokid47: Is there more than one source you can use for the gameplay?Blue Pumpkin Pie (talk) 20:03, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have a Japanese copy of Namco Museum Vol. 2 which includes the game, I might be able to use that. Namcokid47 (talk) 19:35, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Namcokid47: You can also use reviews that are already in the article to supplement the sources too.Blue Pumpkin Pie (talk) 19:39, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Namcokid47: Thank you for adding an additional source for the gameplay. The reception section is a little lacking as before but I added some sources that can be used to help establish it. Luckily there are reviews out there for Namco Museum Vol.2 and if there's any commentary on the game, it can be used in the article too. I won't hold it against the GA to add them or not, but it will help to make this a stronger article. I believe this is good enough to pass.Blue Pumpkin Pie (talk) 02:34, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]