Talk:Cutervo National Park/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Id4abel (talk · contribs) 18:13, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Done Rather than trying to explain the issues with the prose, I just went ahead and made the many minor changes that were mostly passive voice and other small grammatical concerns. Abel (talk) 18:13, 2 October 2016 (UTC) Done Also added convert templates, which also would have been more work to explain rather than just add and let people see the difference in the code. Abel (talk) 18:13, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]