Talk:Customer Account Data Engine

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Taxation (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taxation, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.TaxationWikipedia:WikiProject TaxationTemplate:WikiProject TaxationTaxation articles

United States: Government Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance).

discussion

Wrote this article from materials on IRS.gov and knowledge from working in the industry. I am sure someone knows alot more than me so please contribute :)Cool10191 (talk) 20:20, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's a good start, but there's way too much jargon. A lot of items look like acronyms that nobody but an IRS employee would know. --JD79 (talk) 02:06, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

agreed. I am not sure what some of that stuff means either. It was alot of copy/paste from IRS fact sheets. (Fed Government Materials are not copyrighted). Some of the stuff could be removedCool10191 (talk) 17:01, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting. I wish I could find the spare time to develop an article on the history of how the IRS has processed tax return data down through the years. Anyway, thanks for starting this article! Famspear (talk) 15:43, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Customer Account Data Engine/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

== Class ==

Start class but I think with some work it could go higher. I don't want to make too many suggestion of where this article may be classed because I am a fan of this article, so neat. But anyway. I want to write that the article could use some history and all that, but most of my suggestions for improvement would go towards developing an article that would cover the processing of the IRS throughout its history with this article as a main article for the section on modern processing.EECavazos (talk) 19:39, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

== Priority ==

Low priority because low traffic potential and esoteric.EECavazos (talk) 19:39, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 19:39, 12 May 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 12:35, 29 April 2016 (UTC)