Jump to content

Talk:Curtiss SOC Seagull

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

O3C

[edit]

I understand this aircraft also briefly carried the USN designation O3C? Drutt (talk) 01:08, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed here. That source also gives the date of first flight as March 1934 rather than January 1934. I'll change the article. Drutt (talk) 01:57, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Curtiss SOC Seagull. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:09, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Curtiss SOC Seagull. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:10, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Be made amphibious?

[edit]

Can it be made amphibious, having both wheels and floats simultaneously?184.186.4.209 (talk) 01:38, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Have no real evidence but it seems unlikely as the aircraft would need a major redesign to the large single float to add some sort of landing gear. MilborneOne (talk) 10:01, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

SOC-2 Seaplane Variants

[edit]

There is strong evidence that the SOC-2 had interchangeable wheeled undercarriage and floats or was exclusively a float-equipped aircraft.

1. The Naval History and Heritage Command has published over 150 entries of Location of US Naval Aircraft in WWII, many of which mention SOC-2 aircraft as assigned to cruisers. For example, the 2 January 1945 version lists five cruisers with 1-2 SOC-2s, with the San Francisco entry noting one SOC-1, one SOC-2, and one SOC-3. Other books show similar entries with numbers varying week by week as aircraft are lost/units changed to different aircraft.

2. Joe Baugher's Bureau Number database includes data on 25 of the 40 SOC-2s (Second Series 0001 to 5029). Seventeen of these are listed as lost from specific cruisers with a data attached, including some noted as "capsized", and one (0410) lost from Independence (CVL-22), though this may have been a SOC-2A (0392 and 0415 known converted). For example, "0406 (VCS-4) attached to USS Portland, capsized at sea during recovery accident and sunk by gunfire Jul 9, 1942."

3. There are some photos of aircraft that appear to have SOC-2 on the tail and with floats clearly visible, such as this Navsource photo. However, the SOC-2 floatplane photos I have found are not great quality and I have yet to find a photo that shows SOC-2 and the bureau number clearly, which I would personally need to be sure this doesn't read "SCO-3".

Cruisers could only take float-equipped aircraft, and the capsized aircraft strongly imply floats. The floatplanes photos should be conclusive, but are not clear enough for me to be certain.

Based on this, I strongly suspect the cited sources saying the SOC-2 was a landplane only are in error. I do not have official data sheets on the aircraft at present.

This also opens the question "What was the difference between SOC-2 and SOC-3", since the cited differences are "Similar to SOC-2, but with interchangeable undercarriage." Beachedwhale1945 (talk) 15:38, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Curtiss_SOC_Seagull&oldid=1201286545"