Jump to content

Talk:Curtiss BF2C Goshawk

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Moving of articles

[edit]

I moved to some articles between pages of F11C and BF2C, so they are more concentrating to each model now.

I´m confused by information of licence production in Thailand. I checked some paper encyclopedias and many web pages, but no one confirm it and this production is not included in total number of producted Hawks III. Is Royal Thai Air Force Museum really right about this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shodan99 (talkcontribs) 09:25, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

could someone please tell me if this plane has flaps? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Il2modsarefun (talkcontribs) 21:13, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why this version has its own article?

[edit]

I'm confused... if the BF2C Goshawk is a more advanced version of the F11C Goshawk, why have 2 different articles? Shouldn't they be merged? IMHO, it's like having different articles for the Bf 109 A to E and then F to K versions. Regards, DPdH (talk) 15:29, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think part of the confusion stems from the F11C-2 being redesignated the BFC-2, and the XF11C-3 being redesignated the BF2C-1. The text was somewhat confusing, and I made some errors becasue of that. I think I have it straightend out now. We do have articles of more advanced variants of aircraft, such as with the F-15 and the F-15E. - BilCat (talk) 15:54, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Curtiss BF2C Goshawk. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:35, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]