Talk:Curtiss BF2C Goshawk

Military history: Aviation / North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Aviation: Aircraft

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Moving of articles

I moved to some articles between pages of F11C and BF2C, so they are more concentrating to each model now.

I´m confused by information of licence production in Thailand. I checked some paper encyclopedias and many web pages, but no one confirm it and this production is not included in total number of producted Hawks III. Is Royal Thai Air Force Museum really right about this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shodan99 (talk • contribs) 09:25, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

could someone please tell me if this plane has flaps? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Il2modsarefun (talk • contribs) 21:13, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why this version has its own article?

I'm confused... if the BF2C Goshawk is a more advanced version of the F11C Goshawk, why have 2 different articles? Shouldn't they be merged? IMHO, it's like having different articles for the Bf 109 A to E and then F to K versions. Regards, DPdH (talk) 15:29, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think part of the confusion stems from the F11C-2 being redesignated the BFC-2, and the XF11C-3 being redesignated the BF2C-1. The text was somewhat confusing, and I made some errors becasue of that. I think I have it straightend out now. We do have articles of more advanced variants of aircraft, such as with the F-15 and the F-15E. - BilCat (talk) 15:54, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Curtiss BF2C Goshawk. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131025010322/http://www.rtaf.mi.th/MUSEUM/BLDG2-2.HTM to http://www.rtaf.mi.th/museum/BLDG2-2.HTM

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:35, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]