Jump to content

Talk:Curtis Doebbler

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

Radboud University Nijmegen has only been the name of the university since 2004. Previously it was the Catholic University of Nijmegen. When did Doebbler get his LLM? If it was before 2004 the name ought to be changed to the previous name.--Oxonian2006 17:21, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

[edit]

Dr. Doebbler graduates from Nijmegen University before 1990, but the university says that the new name should be used. robert

WikiProject class rating

[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 16:19, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Birth date and birth place

[edit]

Where and whan is Doebbler born? --Kriddl (talk) 08:47, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Curtis Doebbler. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:20, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Curtis Doebbler. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:54, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why the "In the News" section for Curtis Doebbler was irrelevant and confusing.

[edit]

Rather than providing relevant and informative news articles related to the main article, the section was a mere collection of seemingly random news items that mentioned his name without providing any context or explanation.

To ensure that Wikipedia provides the best possible user experience, it is crucial for us to ensure that any additional sections, such as "In the News," add value and context to the main article. If, however a section is unable to fulfil its intended purpose, it is necessary to either remove it to meet the expectations of readers. Alexandria Bucephalous (talk) 06:34, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]