Talk:Currency detector

Numismatics Mid‑importance

	Numismatics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Numismatics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of numismatics and currencies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NumismaticsWikipedia:WikiProject NumismaticsTemplate:WikiProject Numismaticsnumismatic articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Business Low‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Finance & Investment Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merges

There are two sub-articles which are both stub-length. We could probably merge the lot in here. Chris Cunningham 18:03, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This page has too many different types of products covered on it. "Currency detector" should by design be 2 different topics, "coin acceptor", and "bill acceptor". Also, most of the people who frequent this page and could expand it are professionals working for the manufacturers of these things (I know I am). and we are bound by contract to maintain control over intellectual property and copyrights. I can say that the technologies are completely different, even as to how they transport currency, but I'm not allowed to go any further than that. To merge all this together, while it might make a larger article, misrepresents the underlying technologies involved. What's it going to be? word count, or accuracy? -m--76.161.193.126 (talk) 15:35, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Without something more than nebulous comments about how these devices are totally different on an IP basis, there's no reason to split them again. There's no way for readers to verify that your comment is correct, and thus it would be inappropriate to act on it without further evidence. Chris Cunningham (talk) 18:59, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Banknote Acceptors

The types of counterfeit detectors listed under this section are only one type. There are also ones independent of those in ATMs and vending machines that are used in banks and commercial operations as stand-alone machines. These may be combined with banknote counters or may be simple ultraviolet lights for checking a banknote's luminescence. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.49.98.203 (talk) 20:40, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

For an example of different detectors, check http://www.pro-intell.com/. I'll wait a few days before making any changes to this article, but I do feel that the similar, but different, technology these machines deserve mentioning. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.49.98.203 (talk) 20:44, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notable Companies

With respect to the companies listed, what is the determining factor in listing a company as a "notable" manufacturer? Is there a certain sales volume (my company does $20,000,000 in sales a year) or a location requirement (a dozen countries) that gets a company listed or was it a quick google and the first few results were listed? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.49.98.203 (talk) 20:37, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not really, but you probably should edit that article with caution and read WP:COI. Vegaswikian (talk) 20:44, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, that's what I'm saying. I didn't add any of the "notable" companies... and personally I think it's non-neutral to list them. However, I didn't remove them because I accept that I'm biased, as I am the president of one of their competitors. Ryanfickes (talk) 20:56, 2 September 2009 (UTC) ryanfickes[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Currency detector. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:56, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]