This article is within the scope of WikiProject Children's literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Children's literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Children's literatureWikipedia:WikiProject Children's literatureTemplate:WikiProject Children's literaturechildren and young adult literature articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
I am somewhat baffled as to why this is the subject of an edit war, but there you are - a dozen insertions and deletions of this same phrase. The way to resolve this issue is not to continue to insert and delete the same thing over and over again, but to discuss the matter here and attempt to reach a consensus.
So: "The last puzzle piece was a part of the grass." My opinion would be that this phrase is NOT a key part of the plot summary, and would support removing it.
Please do not insert or remove this phrase again without first contributing to this discussion as to why you feel it should stay or go. PianoDan (talk) 19:37, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Saxones288 and Neel.arunabh: Please stop repeatedly adding the text in question without first explaining why that should occur here, and waiting for consensus. I am responding to a protection request at WP:RFPP which I will decline but will watch this page for a while. If I fail to notice ongoing edit warring, please ping me.The issue is diff which adds text removed by an IP, namely "The last puzzle piece was a part of the grass." Why should that be added? Why should it be removed? Johnuniq (talk) 06:32, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]