Talk:Cuprate superconductor

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Electrical engineering

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electrical engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electrical engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electrical engineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Electrical engineeringTemplate:WikiProject Electrical engineeringelectrical engineering articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Could someone please add a lead?

And maybe move some stuff over from High-temperature superconductivity. OrganoMetallurgy (talk) 22:25, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Cuprates" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Cuprates. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 18:00, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Three or five groups on the phase diagram?

Why are there five groups listed below, but just three "said-to-exist" in the following text in History section: "From 1986, many cuprate superconductors were identified, and can be put into three groups on a phase diagram critical temperature vs. oxygen hole content and copper hole content"? Are the first two couples of entries in the list grouped further together to form the first two such groups, and the fifth entry in the list left to form the third group? At least this is what the depicted phase diagram implies, according to me. Bobbylon (talk) 16:37, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]