Talk:Cuneiform (Unicode block)

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Typography Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Typography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Typography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TypographyWikipedia:WikiProject TypographyTemplate:WikiProject TypographyTypography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Writing systems Low‑importance

	Writing portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Writing systems, a WikiProject interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage and content of articles relating to writing systems on Wikipedia. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project’s talk page.Writing systemsWikipedia:WikiProject Writing systemsTemplate:WikiProject Writing systemsWriting system articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Concordance

I am trying to do this concordance in order to be able to generate Unicode fonts from legacy fonts that are organized by Borger number. However, the concordance as derived from Anderson's sign list seems to be wrong (unless Borger has completely overthrown his scheme in the 2003 edition): B001=ASH is ok. B002 = HAL = ASH.ASH is ok. But B003 = HAL seems mistaken, since already B002 = HAL, and B003 = MUG. B005 = BA, not BAL. BAL is actually B009, and encoded at 12044, not 12045. For this reason, the concordance should be considered broken, and should probably be redone manually (or maybe updated once cuneiformsigns.org is updated?) dab (ᛏ) 12:28, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

table now at list of cuneiform signs dab (ᛏ) 17:24, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

table completed, to be cleaned up

it may be that some "missing signs" may still be mapped to unmatched codepoints. Some unicode character names remain enigmatic. I have no idea what "121B6 CUNEIFORM SIGN KWU318" is supposed to be. Also, what are "12356 CUNEIFORM SIGN USHX", "12358 CUNEIFORM SIGN USHUMX", "12361 CUNEIFORM SIGN ZAMX"? dab (ᛏ) 16:30, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

uploaded Hittite font

(see external links)

Nidaba lead as it renders for me with the font installed

dab (𒁳) 15:36, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

more font headaches

I noticed the cuneiform fonts on this table won't display in my firefox 3.0 browser, however when the table entry is changed from unicode|xxxxxx to cuneiform|xxxxxx it displays fine. I changed the entry for the first sign, if no one else has objections I suggest they all be changed.--Gurdjieff (talk) 15:09, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed the unicode problem and made the table sortable. I think this article can be merged with list of cuneiform signs now that signs can be ordered by multiple schemes in a single sortable table--Gurdjieff (talk) 03:44, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Visibility of forms

What has a user to do to see something else than a rectangle for each cuneiform in the long table? Sae1962 (talk) 08:17, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A sure way is clicking the external link (in the top of the table) to the Unicode chart (pdf). Regarding installing fonts &tc I don't know enough. -DePiep (talk) 19:35, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well I found the solution, it is the same Sign but a different culture, this above is a hittite cunei, and the other 𒑙 a neo-assyrian (assyrian-babylonian) one . -- Room 608 (talk) 12:39, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

BI 𒁉

My Cuneiform BI x12049 looks much simpler Two lines lying one above another with different triangles on both sides, like the left half of AB. BI seems compound here. More like x1202b 𒀫 .--Room 608 (talk) 22:35, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Well I found the solution, it is the same Sign but a different culture, this above is a hittite cunei, and the other 𒑙 a neo-assyrian (assyrian-babylonian) one . -- Room 608 (talk) 12:39, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cuneiform (Unicode block). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927202708/http://flaez.ch/freeidg.html to http://flaez.ch/freeidg.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:03, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]