Talk:CuneiForm (software)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Hmm, can someone check this
[edit]Hmm, can someone check this
No mention of the open sourcing on the US version of the supposed firms website (www.ocr.com), and there are a lot of 'cracking' groups in Russia..
62.56.120.128 (talk) 11:18, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
You can take a look at this news. Unfortunately it is in Russian. Here ate translations from online translation services: Promt and Babel Fish. Look at the very bottom.
Temarez (talk) 12:01, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
There is also news in Cognitive Technologies official website (in Russian also).
There was official press-conference regarding this event on 12 of December.
Temarez (talk) 12:18, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
- OK, Can you get a press release from them? 62.56.77.93 (talk) 14:14, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
- See official press release (translation via Promt or Babel Fish). You can download this great software here. --Yaleks (talk) 16:27, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
- OK, Can you get a press release from them? 62.56.77.93 (talk) 14:14, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
Have anybody tried this product? I've tried today and was surprised: this program haven't recognized anything. The quality of recognition is below any possible limit. --87.252.227.52 (talk) 20:22, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
- You should try to set 200 DPI resolution to get normal results. Quality of recognition in that case can be compared to accuracy of FineReader 4 IMHO Temarez (talk) 21:31, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
Online recognition
[edit]The link to the website simply leads to an "under construction" message. Is this service really up and running? If so, please what is the URL? SharkD (talk) 03:33, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
Used by
[edit]- WatchOCR LiveCD —Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.76.85.242 (talk) 23:33, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
OmniFont claim removed
[edit]I removed this claim, which was marked for clarification:
- CuneiForm uses the OmniFont system.
I think this is referring to a general omnifont approach; it's later explained that Cuneiform combines this with the general multifont approach. More detail would be helpful, but this statement seemed unnecessary and a bit confusing at the moment. -- Beland (talk) 16:00, 22 May 2013 (UTC)