Talk:Cunard-White Star Line

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Transport: Maritime Low‑importance

	Transport portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TransportWikipedia:WikiProject TransportTemplate:WikiProject TransportTransport articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Maritime task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Travel and Tourism Low‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Travel and Tourism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of travel and tourism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Travel and TourismWikipedia:WikiProject Travel and TourismTemplate:WikiProject Travel and TourismTourism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merseyside Low‑importance

	North West England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Merseyside, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Merseyside-related articles. In so doing it works and collaborates with its mother project WikiProject UK Geography. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Please also feel free to join in the discussions on the project's talk page.MerseysideWikipedia:WikiProject MerseysideTemplate:WikiProject MerseysideMerseyside articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

What did the Cunard shareholders buy, and from whom?

The following text may need some clarification and/or a rewire, as it doesn't seem to make sense (to me at least):

In 1947, Cunard shareholders acquired the 38% of Cunard-White Star they didn't already own and in 1949 bought out the entire company, operating individually as the Cunard Line.

I mean, if you own some shares in a company, and acquire the rest, then surely you own the whole company, so how can you buy it out later? 81.191.184.223 (talk) 20:37, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's confusing because it's not right - CWS was never a 'merger' between Cunard & White Star, it was a separate operating company set up, owned 62% by Cunard, and 38% by White Star. Cunard bought White Star's 38% stake in the holding company, dissolved it and returned to being in direct control of the fleet. White Star was simply wound up after this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.155.250.3 (talk) 22:10, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It seems that after these comments were added, the introductory text has been rewritten so as to make everything a clearer, but the text quoted above and also

Cunard shareholders owned 62% of the new company, Cunard White Star, while White Star shareholders owned the remaining 38%.

could still use a rewrite. I suggest removing the word "shareholders" since it may suggest that the shareholders were individually given shares in the new company, which was probably not the case - instead, they owned it indirectly through Cunard or White Star. Even after this, it's not entirely clear what exactly was done in 1949. Perhaps Cunard took over White Star, as opposed to Cunard White Star, or perhaps it was at that point Cunard merged Cunard White Star into the parent company?

I am also struggling to make sense of the following text, in light of the above explanation

Being in a better financial and operating state than their White Star counterparts, Cunard Line shareholders began absorbing all White Star assets and as a result, most of the White Star Liners were quickly disposed of or sent to the breakers' yard

193.69.193.14 (talk) 09:49, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cunard White Star Line

I have changed references to the company name from Cunard-White Star Line to Cunard White Star Line because it seems the latter is the prevelant name used by the company. I will also rename the article to Cunard White Star Line as long as no one objects. GrammarHead (talk) 00:30, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You mention 25 ships but list 30. Also I have a postcard of RMS Andania which has the logo Cunard White Star at the top but is not in your list Labocetta (talk) 16:23, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]