Talk:Cummings Park

Merge proposal

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result was merge into Cummings Park. -- Sgt. R.K. Blue (talk) 07:45, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cummings Beach appears to be a piece of Cummings Park according to the Stamford website cited. I think these articles should be merged. Markvs88 (talk) 15:20, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support: As long as it exists, definitely merge Cummings Beach with Cummings Park. The Cummings Beach "article" is just one sentence long -- even for a stub it’s a stub! --Sgt. R.K. Blue (talk) 04:00, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I also agree. -- JohnWBarber (talk) 23:05, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have gone ahead and redirected Cummings Beach to Cummings Park and bolded the beach name in the park article. --Polaron | Talk 14:45, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Cummings Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:48, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]