Talk:Culture of the Song dynasty/GA1
Appearance
GA Reassessment
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Commencing GA reassessment as part of the GA Sweeps process. ✽ Juniper§ Liege (TALK) 02:12, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
Issues over GA quality regarding this article echo those found in the other articles on the Song dynasty that I have reviewed for the GA Sweeps. Although this article is probably the best written, it also suffers from overlinking and the lead is too short. ✽ Juniper§ Liege (TALK) 18:23, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
- The body of the article is well written. The layout is properly presented; paragraphs are a good size and well developed, with no single or fractured sentences.
- b (MoS):
- Conforms to manual of style. Problems with overlinking have been fixed and reduced.
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
- Well referenced. Good variety of sources.
- b (citations to reliable sources):
- Citations are to third party publications.
- c (OR):
- No evidence of OR.
- a (references):
- It is broad in its scope.
- a (major aspects):
- Addresses major aspect of article subject matter.
- b (focused):
- Remains focused. No digressions.
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy:
-
- No issues concerning POV evident.
-
- It is stable:
- No edit wars etc.
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Images are properly tagged and justified.
- b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Images are accompanied by contextual captions.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Keep/Delist: KEEP
I have passed this; BUT the lead is a cause of concern - it is barely adequate for a GA article of this length and needs expansion. ✽ Juniper§ Liege (TALK) 22:26, 13 February 2010 (UTC)