This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthropology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anthropology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthropologyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthropologyTemplate:WikiProject AnthropologyAnthropology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cultural Evolution, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Cultural EvolutionWikipedia:WikiProject Cultural EvolutionTemplate:WikiProject Cultural EvolutionCultural Evolution articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
This article is written as though any time an anthropologist or sociologist uses the term "cultural trait", they are obliged to follow the schema invented by a biologist, Julian Huxley, presented in a 1955 guest editorial in a anthropology yearbook, a schema that Huxley himself never returned to. One might add a capnote "Needs help from an expert", except that it's precisely cockamamie articles like this one that make experts avoid Wikipedia in the first place (as attested by the large number of Needs help from an expert capnotes over 10 years old). The idea that Edward Burnett Tylor, who died in 1917, depended upon the conceptual clarity of terms cleverly coined by Huxley in 1955, is pure farce. Delete. Vagabond nanoda (talk) 03:36, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]