Talk:Culottes

Culottes vs. "Skorts"

What is the difference between culottes and skorts? I really dislike the trendiness (in a bad way) of the whole skort name, so I was happy to see that it might have a more traditional name. Just curious.

If there is no difference, I recommend a link to culottes in the "skort" section of shorts Ckamaeleon 01:55, 21 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

AIUI skorts have a piece that goes straight across the front like a skirt, and tend to look like normal shorts from the back. So they're quite different garments altogether. FTM, is anyone sure whether one of this garment is a "skort" or "skorts"? Both versions seem to get used. -- Smjg 09:35, 21 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, Smjg. I forgot about the front piece. FWIW, I've always heard the singular (this was in Texas and Arkansas, in case region makes a difference). Ckamaeleon 07:58, 22 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

So it looks like User:67.70.129.105 changed the article to add the phrase "It has also been called a skort (a portmanteau for skirt and shorts)."

I argue that this statement should be removed:

First, it's a "soft" statement. Encyclopedias are no place for hearsay. As it stands, the sentence implies that anyone-- from the world's foremost authority on fashion history to your neighbor's friend's shut-in grandmother-- could make this claim. If someone says that skorts and culottes are the same thing, let's see a citation to back it up.
Second, as User:Smjg points out, there seem to be differences between the two. Let's find someone to clear this up! Ckamaeleon 09:02, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As the original writer of this article I agree completely that a skort and a culotte are different garments. The skort is like shorts, with an extension flap that goes across the front, and look like shorts from the back. Culottes do not have this flap across the front, and don't look like shorts from the back. signed, Sycamore.

Thanks for the recent clarifications. However skorts redirects to shorts and skort redirects to here. Should skort/s get its own article? Samw 19:20, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

At least for the time being, I don't think we've enough material to justify a dedicated article for skorts. My vote is to change the "skort" redirect to match the one for "skorts." It doesn't make sense for the plural to redirect to a different article anyway (you'd think someone would write a bot to check this kind of thing...) I may be wrong, but I think the skort redirect DID go to shorts before, but someone with differing opinions changed it. We could try to change it back. Hopefully, there won't be a revert war. *shudder* Ckamaeleon ((T)) 00:43, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was bold and did the redirect change. Samw 00:48, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Huzzah! :o) Ckamaeleon ((T)) 11:14, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Culottes vs. "Skorts" 2011

There is now an article on skorts. What should be done with the two articles? --Bruce Hall (talk) 08:06, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sans-culottes

Given that sans-culottes links here, this article should discuss the earlier meaning of the term and have at least one picture of the male garment that had the name 200+ years ago. - Jmabel | Talk 18:50, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Probably should also mention that in France today the word means panties (or, in the UK sense knickers). - Jmabel | Talk 18:55, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lacking response, I will edit. - Jmabel | Talk 06:45, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Since Wikipedia is a general encyclopedia, and NOT a just a "current women's fashion encyclopedia," therefore historic terms such as "culottes" should feature the original definition as the primary definition, and then, include any later, temporary, usages of the term as "second" and "third" definitions.

The term "culottes" arose in late-medieval France to describe the knee-breeches of the upper class. There should be ample numbers of drawings and depictions of eighteenth-century gentlemen to show what they looked like, and these should be featured in the first definition of the word. The word is still in use as it is found in any number of books and magazine articles that talk about the dress of that period, most notably in reference to the French Revolution when the lower classes were referred to as "the sans-culottes." For this reason, the original definition of the word should be featured first.

Later usages of the word that have arisen in the late twentieth century should be featured as second and third definitions of the word.PGNormand 16:59, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

picture?

Can we get a picture for first time viewers of this term? You know they say a 1000 words.--71.105.26.163 (talk) 06:39, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

modesty

This article seems to be missing the word "modesty" or anything similar, that seems essential to describing the niche/function/purpose of this clothing style in modern times.-71.174.188.32 (talk) 21:20, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Ken K. Smith (a.k.a. User:Thin Smek) (talk) 09:40, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Which kind of panties are also called "culottes"?

See Talk:Panties#Which kind of panties are also called "culottes"? --5.170.9.126 (talk) 20:54, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Culottes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:32, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Culottes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:12, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Culottes<Cul= buttocks

The word "culotte" is a diminutive of the word "cul" in French, meaning "buttocks", as stated on the French wiki.

https://fr.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Culotte_(vêtement) Ibn Gabirol (talk) 05:03, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]