Talk:Cubic mean
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Translation
[edit] | This article contains a translation of Kubisches Mittel from de.wikipedia. |
References
[edit]According to the German Wikipedia ISO 4301-1:1986-06 shows the usage of the cubic mean. Unfortuntately these are not accessible without payment, so I have no easy way to verify this. Links are:
- freestd.us
- iso.org
- de.wikipedia.org (links from there)
But searching for cubic mean load yields more interesting links:
- creativemotioncontrol.com: Equivalent load
- prmeh.ru: screws: calculation formulas
- design of machine elements
- gear drive systems
- essential concepts of bearing technology
I would say that this should be sufficient evidence for what is said in the article. --Bk1 168 (talk) 22:07, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
- Should we just transfer these references adequately to the main page or do you think we should select only two or three? Which ones?--Bk1 168 (talk) 13:18, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
- Probably select one or two references for the formula, one or two about using it for machinery parts, and one or two saying it can be understood as the generalized mean with p=3. Use the best sources, even if they repeat. They can be placed in multiple places using the name attribute of the ref tag. —PC-XT+ 08:07, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
- Ok, I have added some references. I did not find anything about making it the generalized mean for p=3, but that is quite obvious anyway.--Bk1 168 (talk) 01:23, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
- I haven't yet found any for that statement, either, but it is rather obvious with a link to generalized mean. Here are some places which may have more sources to expand the article: Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL Google scholar gives some articles about evaluating wind generators, in particular, using cubic mean to find an average wind speed. —PC-XT+ 08:27, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
- Ok, I have added some references. I did not find anything about making it the generalized mean for p=3, but that is quite obvious anyway.--Bk1 168 (talk) 01:23, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
- Probably select one or two references for the formula, one or two about using it for machinery parts, and one or two saying it can be understood as the generalized mean with p=3. Use the best sources, even if they repeat. They can be placed in multiple places using the name attribute of the ref tag. —PC-XT+ 08:07, 19 January 2015 (UTC)