Talk:Cubana de Aviación Flight 310

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Cubana de Aviación Flight 310 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Aviation: Accidents

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion not met

This article is supported by the Aviation accident project.

Disaster management Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cuba Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cuba, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cuba related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CubaWikipedia:WikiProject CubaTemplate:WikiProject CubaCuba articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Cuba task list:

Task list

New article announcements:
Requests: Ambrosio Cave, Calero Cave, Centella Cave, Cuba and the United Nations, Cuevas de Punta del Este, Cura Cave, Patana Cave, Pluma Cave
Stubs: Dollar store (Cuba)
Verify: History of Cuba, Fulgencio Batista
Update: Nochebuena
NPOV: Armando Valladares, Delfín Fernández, History of Cuba
Copyedit: Armando Peraza, Bay of Pigs Invasion, Fabio Grobart, Julio Antonio Mella
Cleanup: Abelardo Colomé Ibarra, Antonio Maceo Grajales, Bay of Pigs Invasion, History of Cuba, List of Cubans, Máximo Gómez, War against the Bandits
Style: Fidel Castro
Expand: Cuba–Soviet Union relations, Baseball in Cuba, Religion in Cuba, Havana's International Book Fair, Cuba–Venezuela relations, Antonio Sánchez de Bustamante y Sirven

Venezuela Low‑importance

	Venezuela portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Venezuela, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Venezuela on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VenezuelaWikipedia:WikiProject VenezuelaTemplate:WikiProject VenezuelaVenezuela articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Death Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was nominated for deletion on 4 February 2010. The result of the discussion was keep.

Notability

I'm not seeing the notability of this event. Per WP:NOTNEWS, we shouldn't cover news solely because it made the news. The requirements for notability at WP:EVENT don't seem to apply, at least not according to the article as written. Small planes crash with relative frequency, and I'm not seeing lasting effects, depth or duration of coverage, and definitely not geographical scope or diversity of sources as is. I'm going to give this article a couple days, then nominate for deletion if someone doesn't improve it to include a qualifying element of notability per WP:EVENT. —ShadowRanger ^(talk|stalk) 20:57, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and for the record, it wasn't 22 passengers, it was ten passengers and twelve crew. —ShadowRanger ^(talk|stalk) 21:02, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's an air crash, and there were multiple fatalities on board - I believe that's enough to qualify it as something more than a news article. Look at the talk page for WP:AIRCRASH - there's good enumeration there. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 21:32, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've posted a more elaborate response in the AfD, but to summarize: WP:AIRCRASH guidelines are strongly against inclusion. The fact that one person disagrees doesn't undo the guidelines. —ShadowRanger ^(talk|stalk) 21:31, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps. But as I'm the one who deprodded, I'm providing my rationale. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 01:15, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The AfD closing as "keep" should be conclusive evidence as to the article's notability. Mjroots (talk) 21:52, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP: Death assessment commentary

The article was assessed as Start-class, due to lack of coverage. Some issues to consider:

The article makes no mention of investigation or any additional factors in the causes of the crash, aside from the plane clipping the hill. Was it all human error?
Why were there more crew than passengers? With 12 crew-members and 10 passengers, there would be about one flight-attendant per passenger. Is this a mistake? Or do "scheduled" flights take off regardless of how many passengers are on board?

Boneyard90 (talk) 19:20, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]