Talk:Cryptography law

Cryptography: Computer science Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cryptography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cryptography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CryptographyWikipedia:WikiProject CryptographyTemplate:WikiProject CryptographyCryptography articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computer science (assessed as Mid-importance).

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Cryptography was copied or moved into Cryptography law with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

World Map

It would be nice with one of those maps showing legislation across the world, as you have for some other sites on law. Dunno if one exists / if someone can create it tho. J.Ring 23:00, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

More coverage is required

The name of the article is generic, yet only provide (limited) details on cryptography laws in US and France. Major European countries (Germany, Spain, ...), China, Russia and beyond that holds a dominant place in global tech landscape are also seeing massive changes and should be included here to increase the subject coverage of this article. M Salman Nadeem (talk) 19:36, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Missing Content

Should include Australia's recent (2018) bill requiring companies to provide law enforcement and security agencies access to the plaintext of encrypted communications, and those effects on other Australian and world industries. ^[1]

^ Tarabay, Jamie. "Australian Government Passes Contentious Encryption Law". New York Times. The New York Times. Retrieved 5 February 2019.

Johnnyoss (talk) 07:04, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

Multiple references are broken and go to nonexistent links or are behind a paywall. ThaddeusThomas (talk) 01:01, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Tarabay, Jamie. "Australian Government Passes Contentious Encryption Law". New York Times. The New York Times. Retrieved 5 February 2019.

[1]