Talk:Cryosauna

I removed Category:Pseudoscience

on the grounds that ‘pseudoscience’ is a judgmental epithet; also it is, IMO, a very stigmatizing label, so it should be used sparingly. In this case, this article doesn't have adequate reliable, impartial references justifying its classification as such; indeed, at the top of the article there is a notice of “ unverifiable speculation and unjustified claims” in the article. Okay?--Solomonfromfinland (talk) 05:03, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

References to justify it's not Pseudoscience? That's backwards, see Pseudoscience — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.250.173.147 (talk) 18:05, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]