Talk:Cryobot

Robotics Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Robotics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Robotics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RoboticsWikipedia:WikiProject RoboticsTemplate:WikiProject RoboticsRobotics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

Energy

Where's the cryobot's energy source, especially to melt the ice? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.229.70.93 (talk) 15:38, 22 June 2011 (UTC) the bot carries cables, so it is reasonable to assume that it uses electrical power from the surface. Hakunamenta (talk) 14:10, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Attention needed

Expand
Bring up to date

Chaosdruid (talk) 18:45, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

testing so far (2012)

has this thing really been tested in antarctica? when i read the sources i come to the conclusion that it was never used in antarctica to date (february 2012) but only in spitzbergen (arctica). i guess someone might have mistaken arctis and antarctis. Hakunamenta (talk) 14:15, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ideas for bringing this page up to date

Stone Aerospace has been making very significant progress in the field of cryobots that this article doesn't bring any attention to at all. I would say that their most recent project, VALKYRIE, is definitely note worthy. I mean, it's a laser powered cryobot that has been given NASA funding and will be tested at Matanuska Glacier, Alaska in 2013. There's even a great wired article about it. I would update the wiki article, but I feel that someone else may be better suited for it as I'm not a very good writer. I don't know, maybe I will decide to make the edits... 23:09, 8 May 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.81.25.32 (talk)

I ended up making the edits. I added an entire section on project VALKYRIE, updated information on Lake Vostok, mentioned Enceladus, removed the space.com citation (broken), and made some changes to the wording of other parts of the history section. As I said, I don't view myself as a very good writer so feel free to edit the changes I've made. 04:33, 9 May 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.81.25.32 (talk)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cryobot. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:24, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Antarctic Treaty

I am unable to find anything in the Antarctic Treaty that prohibits this. The treaty specifically bans dumping nuclear waste and testing of nuclear weapons.Kylesenior (talk) 08:26, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Antarctic_Treaty Kylesenior (talk) 08:26, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]