Talk:Crush (2013 film)
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Exemplary "Plot" section
[edit]Thanks to User:Flyer22, the "Plot" section has been revised so that it is succinct, unlike the excessively detailed Plot sections of many other film and book pages. Hopefully, this kind of editing can occur throughout Wikipedia when it comes to articles about narrative artworks.--Soulparadox (talk) 13:40, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
- This. Yes, you're welcome. That plot addition was too long. The length of a Plot section can be a matter of context. Not only should we follow the WP:FILMPLOT guideline, that plot addition was very disproportionate to the rest of the article. And of course the IP messed up the format by deleting the Plot heading, which may have been an accident. Flyer22 (talk) 13:49, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Crush (2013 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130825121347/http://www.best-horror-movies.com/review?name=crush-2013-review to http://www.best-horror-movies.com/review?name=crush-2013-review
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:10, 15 August 2017 (UTC)