Talk:Crush, tear, curl

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Crush or Cut?

Is the technique supposed to be "Crush, Tear, Curl" or "Cut, Tear, Curl"? I'm a bit confused by the first sentence. Sjschen 07:02, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It seems like part of the answer to this question is that many of the people who actually use the term have no interest in what the letters were supposed to stand for; "CTC" has essentially stopped functioning as initials and started functioning as just a strange-looking word. "What does CTC mean?" is normally answered by displaying a sample of the product or the machines used to process it, not by explaining what the letters stand for. Similar things have happened, for example, to "scuba" and "radar"; in general, people have stopped noticing that the letters once stood for words. TooManyFingers (talk) 20:23, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's crush. I've changed it.Damiancorrigan 13:17, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Invention date

The date for the invention of this method is listed on the Tea page as 1932, here as during WW2 and then as in the late 1950's. All are unsourced. Does anyone have an answer and / or a source? --Apyule 03:47, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Taste/color

I removed the following:

The CTC process does not bring out the natural flavors of black tea any faster than the rotovane orthodox process or the orthodox process. The CTC and the rotovane orthodox processes only bring up a tea's colour more quickly than the orthodox process. While the consumer may equate quick color with quick flavour, this is strictly an optical illusion.

Although it seems likely that the CTC process leads to certain compounds being extracted more quickly than others, the assertion above is an exaggeration. At the very least, the pigments in black tea themselves have a distinct flavor contribution, so it would not be possible to extract color more quickly without extracting the attendant tastes. --Sneftel (talk) 14:54, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Homeland of tea"?

What is this "homeland of tea itself" in the last sentence? Does it refer to India where it's made, or China where Camellia sinensis originated? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.44.55.163 (talk) 03:26, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Assam region is also an original environment for tea plants, so maybe that. Whitebox (talk) 13:20, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Crush, tear, curl. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100612235935/http://teaandcoffee.net/1109/tea.htm to http://www.teaandcoffee.net/1109/tea.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:10, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Photo of wrong machine?

There is a photo here of a yellow-painted piece of machinery. However, if you look more closely, there is a white card attached to it identifying it as "Orthodox". This article is not about orthodox tea, so it seems to be exactly the wrong machine to show. (Unless the white card has a stupid mistake on it, in which case we would need very strong and authoritative sources for that before we say it.) TooManyFingers (talk) 20:04, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]