Talk:Crown Property Bureau

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Crown Property Bureau article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thailand Mid‑importance

	Thailand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Thailand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Thailand-related articles on Wikipedia. The WikiProject is also a part of the Counteracting systematic bias group aiming to provide a wider and more detailed coverage on countries and areas of the encyclopedia which are notably less developed than the rest. If you would like to help improve this and other Thailand-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.ThailandWikipedia:WikiProject ThailandTemplate:WikiProject ThailandThailand articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Southeast Asia Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Southeast Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Southeast Asia-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Southeast AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Southeast AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Southeast AsiaSoutheast Asia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Business Mid‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Neutrality disputed, article imbalanced

Show me the sources. Mr Patiwat again. Surely you're not Paul Handley in disguise? Is there a way to question the neutrality of a member? (To those who will dispute me, at the very least, present BOTH sides of the story even if you disagree with it.)

Enough with the ad hominem. As for evidence of bias, observe how this page focuses on the controversial issues without giving space to any other subjects. Surely Mr Patiwat can donate a few paragraphs to explain the Crown Property Bureau's portfolio, or perhaps to recent criticism of the Crown Property Bureau especially in the Suan Lum Night Bazaar case. Let the facts speak for themselves, let the imbalance be made clear. -Salapao Salapao 18:37, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you asking for sources but at the same time deleting references? And how can you claim that I'm POV if you're adding POV unsourced material of your own? Patiwat 22:54, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've added a large section on the CPB's non-controversial holdings and have removed the tag. Patiwat 23:45, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Trouble archiving links on the article

Hello. I am finding myself repeatedly archiving links on this page. This usually happens when the archive doesn't recognize the archive to be good.

This could be because the link is either a redirect, or I am unknowingly archiving a dead link. Please check the following links to see if it's redirecting, or in anyway bad, and fix them, if possible.

In any event this will be the only notification in regards to these links, and I will discontinue my attempts to archive these pages.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 14:37, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Crown Property Bureau. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070809204241/http://www.crownproperty.or.th/history.php to http://www.crownproperty.or.th/history.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:53, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Asset section needs a revise

Currently, I believe all of assets were transfer to the King. So the asset section is irrelevant. I believe this agency now does not hold any major asset but operating as a manager or a keeper for the King. Thus it is not WikiProject Business anymore because it was identify as a government agency (adminitrative agency).

--Wake it up (talk) 10:23, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It may be moved to Vajiralongkorn instead but that would be confuse. Do you have any suggestion on this? I may summerized what happened in one section then I will write new wealth/asset section in Vajiralongkorn. --Wake it up (talk) 18:06, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think the best course is to keep the content in this article, but revise to reflect that it is historical and provide updates on how the transfers happened. We'll probably need to create a separate article in order to provide a proper overview of the entire royal assets situation. --Paul_012 (talk) 18:41, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]