Talk:Crown (dental restoration)/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]This article does not fulfill the Good Article criteria at this time. Furthermore, it contains clean-up banners, {{fact}} tags, and also has an extreme lack of references, all of which points to a quick fail. Please ensure that these issues have been addressed before nominating again at WP:GAC. María (habla conmigo) 19:33, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
- I guess you got here before I did, Maria! In that case, I will say that I completely concur with your review, Maria, and furthermore, add a few more points that need to be worked on:
- There should not be bullet points in the lead, per MOS
- Website references should have publishers and access dates
- Books should be properly formatted with publishers
- Image captions should be concise, with most material being contained in the body of the article, rather than an image caption
- MOS recommends that images be staggered right and left, rather than being stacked down the right hand side of the page.
- Let me know on my talk page if you have any questions. Dana boomer (talk) 19:40, 28 August 2008 (UTC)