Talk:Crowley's Ridge

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Missouri Mid‑importance

	Missouri portal This article is part of WikiProject Missouri, a WikiProject related to the U.S. state of Missouri. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MissouriWikipedia:WikiProject MissouriTemplate:WikiProject MissouriMissouri articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Arkansas Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Arkansas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Arkansas (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article lacks sufficient references and adequate inline citations. Once the references are added, please remove the `\|unref=` parameter from this template.

Crowley's Ridge Parkway

There is a small article entitled as above that may have some additive value for this article. I don't know the subject well enough to do anything except recommend a merge. Cheers! --Stormbay 02:16, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done - wasn't much there to merge. Vsmith 01:04, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Roads tagging

Since this is not primarily focused on the scenic byway (it being only a tangential topic in this article), I am removing the U.S. Roads tag. —Scott5114 ↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 09:19, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Since the parkway has been merged here, I put it back. If a new article for the parkway is created, it can be moved. --NE2 16:53, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have the redirected tagged with USRD. Shouldn't that suffice for keeping the article flagged as a potential subject of a new article? Otherwise it doesn't really make much sense to have a geologic formation tagged with a road tag...even if a scenic parkway was merged into it.—Scott5114 ↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 18:01, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That doesn't place it in any of the assessment framework, since the bot ignores redirects. --NE2 21:40, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, if no article exists, there's nothing we need to assess, right? We don't really need the bot to enumerate the redirects, because MediaWiki will tell us the total number of pages in the category now. ("The following 200 pages are in this category, out of 1,319 total.") So I think that's really not an issue. —Scott5114 ↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 06:31, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Map

Where the heck can I get some good GIS data for Arkansas? The state GIS site just comes up blank — the danged hillbillies probably coded explicitly for Interweb Exploder or something. I'd like to add rivers, such as the St. Francis that cuts through the ridge. I guess I could get the Tiger files, but their hydrology data is bundled by county, not for the whole state. --Kbh3^rd talk 06:24, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

staanley is ligit —Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.29.128.253 (talk) 16:34, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Crowley's Ridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20030312233828/http://www.scsc.k12.ar.us:80/BorneC/newpage9.htm to http://www.scsc.k12.ar.us/BorneC/newpage9.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 23:32, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Crowley's Ridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:04, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]