Jump to content

Talk:Crowes railway line

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Merger proposal

[edit]

I propose that Crowes railway station be merged into Crowes railway line. The former article consists of just two sentences and an infobox, and it cites no sources nor does it indicate notability. --Novarupta (talk) 13:56, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. The line had more than twenty stations and it was a substantial terminus. Crowes railway station needs expansion, not quasi-deletion. The Drover's Wife (talk) 17:13, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. I agree with The Drover's Wife that it needs expansion. There is a lot more info that can be added, as it was a terminus, it had a number of facilities its current status, etc. Supt. of Printing (talk) 06:45, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I'll remove the merge tags then. --Novarupta (talk) 09:58, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Crowes railway line. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:23, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]